EFCC Quizzes Another Ex-Gov, Sons Over ‘N150b Fraud’ [THE NATION]
- Father allegedly collected over N48billion as security votes in eight years
- Speaker son operates 100 accounts with 80% still active
- How BVN exposed looted funds
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has launched a massive probe into alleged looting of over N150 billion by the immediate past governor of Abia State, Chief Theodore Orji, and members of his family.
His sons – Chinendum Orji Eyinanya (currently Speaker, Abia State House of Assembly) and one Ogonna Orji – are also being investigated for having a hand in the alleged looting.
Orji is currently the senator representing Abia Central in the National Assembly.
The EFCC suspects that Senator Orji collected N48billion as security votes during his eight years in office at N500million per month.
He is said to have also been the authorising officer for the monthly withdrawal of N500million when he was the Chief of Staff to the jailed ex-Governor Orji Uzor Kalu.
Investigators handling the probe rate Chinedum as a key player in laundering money for his father.
As at Thursday, the EFCC had traced 100 slush accounts to Chinedum.
Eighty per cent of the accounts are still active, The Nation gathered.
Chinedum went through a fresh round of grilling on Thursday before he was released on administrative bail.
However, a source told The Nation in Abuja that what has been uncovered so far against ex-Governor Orji and his sons, is a “tip of the iceberg” because more accounts linked to the family have just been uncovered.
Rich Nigerians To Pay More Tax [THE NATION]
Those who make more money from the system will pay a more equitable share of their income as tax towards the public good.
A clear roadmap to achieving this national imperative was outlined at the weekend in Abuja on the final day of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) Management Retreat by paper presenters, discussants and the audience who rubbed minds over the 2019 Finance Act.
The Lead Paper delivered by renowned tax expert, Mr. Taiwo Oyedele, titled Strategies for implementing the New VAT Regime and the panel discussion which dismissed erroneous public apprehension that the new 7.5% VAT would impact negatively on poor Nigerians as it made clear that the well-to-do would now pay their fair share of taxes in the country unlike before.
Oyedele noted that “the key to building this fair, equitable tax system is transparency, accountability, integrity, work and objectivity to build confidence in taxpayers and stakeholders in the tax sector.”
Towards accomplishing this, the FIRS 2020 Corporate Plan was also unveiled at yesterday’s session and subjected to a robust, on-the-spot debate, according to a statement made available to the media in Abuja by Director of Communications, FIRS, Abdullahi Ismaila.
Capping the day was the official presentation of the new FIRS Organizational Structure as approved by the Services Board. Presenting the new organizational structure, Executive Chairman, FIRS, Mr. Muhammad Nami, disclosed that many posts in the organogram were vacant and open to the FIRS officials.
1995 ‘Coup’: How Obasanjo, Yar’Adua, Gwadabe Were Maltreated — Ex-EFCC Chairman [THE NATION]
- Ex-Niger governor had cardiac arrest
- Omenka used to dance Makossa after torturing suspects
A former Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Mrs. Farida Waziri has given a fresh insight into the 1995 alleged coup during the Gen. Sani Abacha regime.
Ex-President Olusegun Obasanjo, the late General Shehu Musa Yar’Adua, Col. Lawan Gwadabe and Senator Chris Anyanwu were all tried and ended up in jail on the strength of the allegations against them.
Yar’Adua died in the Abakaliki Prisons while serving his term.
Mrs. Waziri believes there was something dubious about the alleged coup and the caliber of names linked with the plot made it questionable.
The former EFCC boss in her newly released memoir Farida Waziri: One Step Ahead recalls how she and a former Chief of Staff, General Abdulrahman Dambazau watched Obasanjo confidently rubbish the allegations leveled at him by Colonel Bello Fadile during the trial.
The book, due for launch on Tuesday, is about her life as a spy, detective and anti-graft czar.
She said when she complained to a former Inspector-General of Police, the late Alhaji Ibrahim Coomasie that charges were being framed up against the suspects, he responded thus: “there are things beyond our power to control or influence.”
She described a former head of Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI), Col. Frank Omenka as a psychopath who used to dance to Makossa music after torturing suspects.
The extracts read in part: “After 1976, my view about coup d’états was conservative. A coup, whether bloody or not, is a piece of a nasty conundrum and I’d rather ponder about it from a safe distance. But as Commissioner of Police B Operations (B/Ops), there was no way I could stand aloof from the current situation. I was appointed into the legal team that was to work with the Special Investigative Panel (SIP) on the trial of the suspected coup plotters. Retired Colonel Joseph Akaagerger, a former governor of Katsina State, led the legal team, while Major General Felix Mujakpero, a very nice gentleman, headed the SIP.
“The SIP was to convene at Alexander Avenue in lkoyi. I decided to visit the location days before the start of proceedings. The intention was to familiarise myself with the environment in which I would no doubt be spending the next few working weeks or maybe months. Ikoyi was a quiet, beautiful suburb of Lagos with tree-lined avenues framing elegant colonial houses set on large generous grounds.
“I went around the house and covered the grounds, including the Boys Quarters- a colonial legacy, dwellings set away from the main house for domestic servants. What I saw at the Boys Quarters filled me with unease.
“A detachment of soldiers was busy digging up the floors. In one room, they had dug out the tiles and were putting in hooks all over the now exposed earthen floor. In another room, the floor had been excavated creating a pit that the soldiers now proceeded to fill with refuse from the dustbin, the smell was pungent and unbearable, is it where the suspect will stay, why make it unhealthy, I asked them, but there was no response. Later, I realised only the junior suspects remained there. The panel commenced sitting, and work began in earnest. The legal team didn’t participate in the interrogations, but its members witnessed some of the proceedings through a one-way glass window.
“Not all the interrogations occurred in the open. Some took place in the reconstructed Boys Quarters. Others progressed outside the premises at obscured locations, and there was no doubt that the interrogators employed torture. The suspects often returned in bad shape, with swollen faces and bruised bodies. Some of them could hardly walk.
“Colonel Frank Omenka was the chief interrogator. Many things had been written about Omenka by those who crossed his path. I can only add a few annotations. Omenka was harsh in his methods. He loved his job. He enjoyed the misery he inflicted on suspects. I hold the conviction that he was a full- blown psychopath. He had a record player in his office. After a vigorous interrogation session during which he was in a good mood, he’d go to his office and dance to loud Makossa music. If you happened to come into his office at that time, he would invite you to dance with him. I always declined.
“Given the political climate at the time, we knew our task was a delicate one from the outset. An air of palpable paranoia hung over the proceedings, particularly, when a young officer who was initially on the investigative panel, Captain Musa, suddenly appeared one day in manacles as a suspect. We never found out how his connection. But the lesson was passed.
“We kept to ourselves for fear of being implicated. It was a delicate situation for many of us on the legal team because we were familiar with quite a few of the detainees. Their approach was telegraphed to us by the loud clanking of their manacles that gave us ample time to take cover and thus avoid any accidental meetings.”
Mrs. Waziri recounted her observations and interactions with some of the high-profile suspects.
She said: “Observing some of the detainees was somewhat disturbing, and for years, I was haunted by what I saw in their eyes. It was a look that defied verbal description, a look of naked despair. Even before interrogation, they had already resigned themselves to death.
“However, I broke my own rule. I couldn’t help but sympathise with a few of the suspects. For instance, Chris Anyanwu was a friend, a popular journalist, editor and publisher (and senator years later).The least I could do was to encourage her to eat and keep her spirit up. I urged her to write all she knew about the incident truthfully. Truth, I thought, always holds a glimmer of hope.
“I also knew Colonel Lawan Gwadabe. I would usually greet him whenever I saw him. He was a fine and outstanding officer, a brave man who showed no fear despite his ordeal at the hands of his interrogators. For some unfounded reasons, his interrogators had the conviction that he was involved in the coup plot, and they were determined to break him and extract a confession out of him by any means. Though held on the premises, he was frequently taken out to undisclosed locations for torture.
“On one occasion, he was taken out early in the morning. They brought him back the following morning a complete wreck, unable to walk.
“Upon orders from above, he was sent to undergo physiotherapy before his next interrogation could begin. On another occasion, they administered the so-called “truth pills” on him and the drug triggered a cardiac arrest that left Gwadabe unconscious and threw his interrogators into a panic. The process came to a forced stop as they made frantic efforts to resuscitate him. They could not bear the thought of him dying because their mandate was to extract a confession. On that score, Gwadabe defeated them. They could not break him. Their frustration became apparent at a meeting of the SIP.
“They claimed to have reliable intelligence that “what Colonel Gwadabe cherished most in this world is his wife.” They would love to bring her in for ‘questioning’ to compel Gwadabe to cooperate.
“What a diabolical suggestion! I was seized by righteous indignation. It was clear by then to other dispassionate observers and me that Colonel Gwadabe was falsely implicated for reasons other than being a part of the alleged coup.
“Now, they were suggesting giving the brutish Colonel Omenka the discretion to interrogate (a euphemism for torture) Gwadabe’s wife to coerce a confession out of the man.
“Gentlemen, we cannot stoop this low,” I protested. “We all know that no soldier planning a coup involves his wife. First, men don’t trust women to keep secrets.
“Secondly, the soldier knows his wife would be too terrified and would do anything within her power to prevent his involvement. Everyone knows the deadly consequences of a failed coup. Wives are always the last to know what their husbands have been up to in this regard.
“They do find out just like any other member of the public, from the early morning broadcast and on the pages of the newspapers. We cannot and should not co-sign the detention and possible abuse of an innocent wife, just to get at her husband.” Mercifully, there was a unanimous agreement. The idea was dropped.”
She added that the accuser given a script to implicate a former Chief of Staff, Supreme Headquarters, Gen. Shehu Musa Yar’Adua later admitted that it was the State Security Services (SSS) which gave him a script to act.
She said the written report given to the accuser was later found hidden in the ceiling of the home of the accuser,
She said: “I also had contact with General Shehu Musa Yar’Adua. He was Chief of Staff, Supreme Military Council when General Obasanjo was head of state from 1976 to 1979. He was brought in looking unsettled. I studied him through the one-way glass window. He sat quietly in the room, nervous and chain-smoking, wracked intermittently by fits of cough. When I had the opportunity, I entered the room and politely said to him, “Sir, why are you doing this to yourself? It seems smoking is not good for your health.” He gave me a wry look. “If you were in my shoes, what would you do?” he asked. “If I were in your shoes, I would be praying,” I responded.
“As an observer of most of the SIP sittings during the trial of General Yar’Adua, I had the conviction that he was falsely implicated. The witnesses arranged against him could not substantiate their claims.
“For example, the chief accuser who claimed he attended the coup meeting in Yar’Adua’s lkoyi home couldn’t identify the house when driven around the neighbourhood. Neither could he identify critical places, where clandestine meetings allegedly occurred with the general in attendance. His claim that about fifty (50) guests attended a dinner in Yar’Adua’s sitting room was proven false.
“When taken into the general’s home, he found a living room that could barely accommodate twenty, not 50 visitors. He had lamely changed his statement to “I was standing by the window.
“Caught in a web of lies, he later confessed that an SSS operative gave him a written report, with the instruction to copy the information about Yar’Adua’s involvement in the coup.
“When completed, burn the book,” that was the instruction according to him. We found the book hidden in the ceiling of his home. The accuser was handcuffed and subsequently tried.
“After reviewing the evidence, the legal team agreed on reasonable felony for Yar’Adua. The basis was that he might have known about the coup, but it could not be proved. We drafted charges for a treasonable felony and closed for the day.
“The next morning began on a dramatic note. Others were seated by the time I arrived. I found them in a pensive mood. My jovial greeting drew solemn responses. My offhand question ‘have we finished for the day’ drew murmurs. My file laid face down on the table. I turned it over and got a shock. General Yar’Adua’s indictment had changed to treason. I could hardly contain my anger: “What is this? Didn’t we all agree yesterday on treasonable felony?”
“None of them replied. They sat in subdued silence. I was so upset for this blatant interference with judicial due process that I dropped the file and abandoned the morning session. I went home and told Ajuji, my husband, what happened. Just be careful was all he said. That was hardly satisfactory to me.
“I headed to the Force Headquarters to complain to the Inspector General of Police, Alhaji Ibrahim Coomasie.
“We know what is happening,” he said. “Sometimes, there are things beyond our power to control or influence.”
“So it was that General Shehu Musa Yar’Adua was sentenced for treason. Sadly, he died in prison.”
She described Obasanjo’s appearance before the SIP as the “most climatic experience” because of his composure and brilliance.
She said: “The most climatic experience of the whole affair, for me, was my encounter with General Olusegun Obasanjo. When rumours circulated that the former Head of State was in custody as one of the conspirators, those of us in the legal team didn’t know what to make of the new development.
“We all knew Obasanjo for his outstanding qualifications. He is a post-colonial senior officer of the Nigerian Army, a hero of the Nigerian Civil War with the 3rd Marine Commandos. He was the Colonel who accepted the surrender of Biafra from General Philip Effiong, at the ceremony that ended the Nigerian Civil War in January 1970.Above all, he is a former Head of State and Commander-in-Chief of the Nigerian Armed Forces.
“It seemed something was not right for two fundamental reasons. First, General Obasanjo was a superior military officer to all those at the helm of the current government. Second, most of the officers with whom he allegedly conspired were not even commissioned into the Nigerian Army when he was a ranking officer.
“The situation was strange and unprecedented. No one could tell where it headed. The atmosphere at the premises in Ikoyi was tense. We had mixed emotions of excitement, anticipation and fear.
“Our feelings were at fever pitch when finally, Generals Obasanjo and Yar’Adua arrived. Observing them through the one-way glass mirror of the interrogation room, I intuited a hidden agenda. As I mentioned earlier, General Yar’Adua was nervous and looked troubled and sometimes angry. Obasanjo, on the other hand, was unruffled. Calm and composed, he exuded an air of quiet dignity and confidence. I found his reaction intriguing. He endured the interrogations with the same character with which he entered the premises. Though his file did not come down to the legal department, we observed some of his interrogations.
“A session remained vivid in my mind. General Abdulrahman Dambazau and I observed the proceeding through a closed-circuit TV system. We marveled at his brilliance, intelligence and forensic skills. It was a particularly grueling session.
“Obasanjo was brought in early in the morning. His interrogation lasted till dusk. Without the aid of notes or any other external props, he defended himself, reeling off facts, figures, dates, appointment schedules and a myriad of other details. When he took his turn to cross-examine his chief accuser, Colonel Bello Fadile, the general, in our opinion, destroyed the veracity of the accusations leveled against him. At the end of the session, General Dambazau and I looked at each other and in unison concurred, “This man is innocent.”
“One evening after an interrogation session, it was getting late, and Obasanjo, a diabetic patient, was waiting for his meal of beans from his farm in Ota. There was a delay in getting the meal to him. He was in a great deal of discomfort as his blood sugar level began to drop. Feeling sorry for him, I approached the senior officer and offered to dash home, not far, to prepare a meal of beans for him. The officer smiled and said nothing. I missed the message. Another officer pulled me aside and cautioned me about getting involved with the detainees, to avoid getting implicated. What if you prepare food for him and something happens?
“The legal team ultimately sentenced General Obasanjo to death; the sentence was commuted to 30 years in prison; and the transitional government of General Abdulsalami Abubakar pardoned and released him from jail. He subsequently became the democratically elected President of the Republic of Nigeria.
“In later years, whenever I think of the events of February 1995, particularly about the two generals, I try to find answers to some riddles of life. Two retired army generals, good friends with similar career trajectories, both accused of treason, and both sentenced to death, they came to divergent endings. One did not live to tell the story; the other lived to rise to the highest office of the land by popular means— the irony of life. Yar’Adua probably felt the premonition of death.”
In what appeared a clear verdict, the former EFCC chairman described the alleged 1995 Coup as dubious
She said: “The alleged coup of February 28, 1995, it happened in the second year of General Sani Abacha’s reign as Head of State. There was something dubious about it. Historians called it a phantom coup. In other words, a conspiracy by the powers-that-be against selected targets critical of the state of the nation.
“Well, I have no opinion about that. However, the calibre of names associated with the plot made it questionable, especially when the likes of retired Generals Olusegun Obasanjo, former Head of State, and Shehu Musa Yar’Adua, former Chief of Staff, Supreme Military Council, were alleged alongside high-ranking officers such as Brigadier Lawan Gwadabe who in all probability were the least likely candidates for mutiny.”
Amotekun: Southwest States Ratify Legal Framework [THE NATION]
- Ekiti, Lagos, Ogun, Ondo, Osun, Oyo Assemblies to receive draft bill soon
The Western Nigeria Security Network codenamed Operation Amotekun is beginning to develop its legal teeth.
Following wide consultations, the Attorneys-General (AGs) of Ekiti, Lagos, Ogun, Ondo, Osun and Oyo states met in Ibadan all night on Friday to put finishing touches to the legal framework to make the security outfit operational.
It was a full house at the meeting with all the AGs in attendance.
In attendance were Prof Oyewole Oyewo (Oyo), Mr. Oluwafemi Akande (Osun), Mr. Olawale Fapohunda (Ekiti), Mr. Adekola Olawole (Ondo), Mr. Akingbolahan Adeniran (Ogun) and Mr. Moyosore Onigbanjo (Lagos) who was represented by the Director of Civil Litigation, Mr. S. A. Quadri.
Also there were officials of the Southwest regional think tank, Development Agenda for Western Nigeria (DAWN) Commission, led by the Director General, Mr. Seye Oyeleye.
The governors of the six states are expected to meet in Ibadan on Thursday to ratify the decisions of their chief legal officers preparatory to action by each state executive council and then the state assemblies.
According to the details of the agreed framework, each of the Southwest states will have its own legislation and its own security network operatives to be known as Amotekun Corps.
The meeting which started around 7pm lasted about three hours behind closed doors at Davies Hotel, Bodija, Ibadan.
Addressing journalists at the end of the meeting, Oyewo dismissed suggestions that the meeting was shifted from last Thursday to Friday for political reasons.
‘Why Buhari Didn’t Act On NASS Resolution To Sack Service Chiefs’ [PUNCH]
Details have emerged surrounding the refusal of the President, Major General Muhammadu Buhari (retd.), to sack the service chiefs after meeting with the President of the Senate, Ahmad Lawan, and Speaker of the House of Representatives, Femi Gbajabiamila, over the deteriorating security situation in the country at the Presidential Villa, Abuja, on Monday.
This came days after both chambers of the National Assembly passed resolutions on the security situation to formally present the resolutions to Buhari.
While the House urged the President to sack the service chiefs and appoint new ones, the Senate sought the imposing of a state of emergency on insecurity.
Findings by Saturday PUNCH on Friday indicated that though Buhari at the meeting saw reasons in the position of the House, in particular, he was not obliged to act immediately as requested by the lawmakers.
A top National Assembly official told Saturday PUNCH that the President did not want to appear like he was taking directives from the legislature.
The official said, “The President was on the same page with the National Assembly but did not want to seem he was under the directive of the National Assembly.”
It was learnt that the legislators argued that given the current cordial relationship between the President and the legislature, Buhari should act on the resolutions, just as he expected the lawmakers to act on his requests.
The source said, “There was the argument that for reciprocity he should act on the resolutions of the National Assembly since he too expected the lawmakers to yield to his proposals to the National Assembly.
“But the President felt he would decide by himself if he needed to (sack the service chiefs), not because the National Assembly said so. He is not taking directives from them.” However, the President was said to be “truly embarrassed” by the security situation and admitted so to Lawan and Gbajabiamila at the meeting.
The official, who chairs a key legislative committee, added, “From the conclusions reached, he will eventually sack the service chiefs.
“He is buying time. What is not certain is when he will do it. He will allow some time to pass. If you know the President, he will not act now simply because the legislature wants him to sack the service chiefs.” Speaking with State House Correspondents after the one-hour meeting, both Lawan and Gbajabiamila admitted that the case of the service chiefs was a key issue mentioned among the general discussions on insecurity.
When Lawan was asked a specific question on whether the sacking of the service chiefs was discussed with Buhari, he said, “We discussed everything that matters as far as the issue of security of this country is concerned.
“We believe that we must be able to provide the necessary equipment and welfare for the armed forces and the police to ensure that they can operate and perform efficiently and effectively.”
Nollywood Movies Promoting Money Rituals, Encouraging Kidnapping – Fashola [PUNCH]
Without doubt, one of the common themes in Nollywood is money rituals. While such stories could be entertaining, especially with the mystical manipulations embedded in them, Minister of Works and Housing and former governor of Lagos State, Babatunde Fashola, during the week asked moviemakers to stop telling such stories, because, according to him, money ritual is a myth.
Fashola, who was the guest speaker at the fourth annual public lecture/symposium organised by the United Action for Change, themed, ‘Security of citizens as a social contract’, said that belief system, reinforced through Nollywood movies, could be fuelling kidnapping, given the number of persons the police have arrested with human skull and other body parts, with the motive of money ritual.
But the former governor, who titled his lecture, ‘Insecurity: Taking actions against organised crime’, however, said it was high time moviemakers and policymakers changed the narrative, to save innocent lives from being wasted.
Fashola said, “Some people believe that if you get a man’s head or a woman’s body parts, they could be turned into money. It’s not true! And when you ask people who believe in it if they have seen it happen before, they tell you someone said they had seen it.
“However, it has become a reinforced belief through entertainment, social media and Nollywood. How can human head bring money? Money is paper invented by man, not God. They put the paper in a machine to print what we call money and that is the only place money comes from.
“But the challenge is the belief system. Just think about how many people have been missing – through kidnapping – because some people believe that it exists. The police could tell us the number of people they have apprehended with human parts, such as skulls. This belief system must go.
“Therefore, all of us, including those who make the films, must reverse the story and start selling a new story that money is printed in a machine and not through any other way like money rituals.”
He also faulted the fears that engulfed the populace last year when there were reports that cyber fraudsters were stealing women’s briefs to make money.
Fashola said, “It is not true, or how does that happen? What is the connection between paper (money) and cotton (pants) or has anybody seen cotton money before? Those of us who have influence and authority must take positions to see to the reversal of this kind of beliefs.”
Don’t Delay Amotekun Bill, South-West Assemblies Urge Govs [PUNCH]
The Houses of Assembly of states in the South-West, comprising Oyo, Osun, Lagos, Ekiti, Ondo and Ogun states, have said they will give accelerated hearing to the bill on the Western Nigeria Security Network, popularly known as Operation Amotekun, as soon as it is presented to them by the Executive.
They therefore urged the governors not to delay in sending the bill to them for consideration and passage into law.
The governors of the six states in the South-West had, in a response to the spate of killings and kidnapping in the region, launched Operation Amotekun on January 9, 2020 in Ibadan, the Oyo State capital to provide security for their people.
RMAFC May Cut Salaries Of President, Govs, CJN, NASS Members, Others [LEADERSHIP]
There were indications at the weekend that the Revenue Mobilisation, Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) may cut the salaries and wages of politicians and judicial officers, including those of the president, the vice president, governors of the 36 states of the federation, National Assembly members and other political office holders.
Chairman of the commission, Mr Elias Mbam, who spoke to journalists in Abuja at the weekend refused to disclose whether the review of the salaries and wages of political officeholders and judicial officers was going to be downward or upward.
He stated however that the salary review was in line with current economic realities and President Muhammadu Buhari’s directive to the RMAFC team to “do everything to increase the size of the cake, block leakages and reduce the cost of governance”.
He also revealed that the commission has commenced verification of the books of Deposit Money Banks (DMBs) collecting revenues, including Stamp Duty on behalf of all the government revenue generating agencies from January 2016 to December 2019.
Asked if the commission has the backing of the presidency to review the salaries and wages of political officeholders, Mbam said, “First and foremost we are established by law and the law, in this circumstance the constitution, has clearly spelt out our responsibility and those responsibilities are very clear.
“One of them is to determine the remuneration appropriate for public and judicial office holders. So, it is our job. We can’t go to get permission to do our job. In that respect, you will believe with me …that it should be reviewed and it is part of our responsibility. And the president charged us on the day he inaugurated us to do everything to increase the size of the cake, block leakages and reduce the cost of governance.
“So, we are following the law establishing us and I don’t want to be pessimistic. I want you to make contributions to ensure that it succeeds. Why shouldn’t it succeed? It is we that will determine it. Particularly, you know the press determines how things flow. The press has a great role to play in supporting us in molding the opinions of Nigerians. I can tell you the much I know and read that an average Nigerian wants it reviewed.
“But what they have been asking me and I don’t want to say or to give an answer before we arrive is if it’s going to be up or down. What I have always said is that this is a process and at the end of the process we will determine what it will be. So, don’t ask me whether it will be down or up. I won’t say. Let the process flow and at the end, the result will come out”.
Poor Quality, High Price Threaten Nigerian Rice Policy [LEADERSHIP]
The policy of the present administration to ensure Nigeria produces enough rice to feed its citizens and export to other countries, laudable as it is, may not be realised after all if certain actions are not taken by the government. JOSEPH CHIBUEZE reports.
This administration’s policy of producing what you eat and eating what you produce, has been described as one patriotic policy that has the potential of making Nigeria a nation self-sufficient in food production.
The government has also tried to match its words with action by its special focus on agriculture using various intervention programmes including the Anchor Borrowers Scheme of the Central Bank of Nigeria, the Rice Revolution programme and partnerships with various foreign agencies who are developing different agricultural value chains including climate resilient crops.
The government’s focus and interest on rice is unquestionable, in fact the attention the federal government is giving to rice is like the attention the government gives to football against other sports.
But that is understandable, according to the Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) of the United Nations, Nigeria is Africa’s leading consumer of rice, one of the largest producers of rice in Africa and simultaneously one of the largest rice importers in the world, in fact, it contributes a large chunk to the nation’s annual food imports.
It is reported that Nigeria spends an average of $22 billion (₦7.92 trillion) each year on food imports of which rice alone accounts for about $1.65 billion, or ₦0.59 trillion.
Rice is said to generate more income for Nigerian farmers than any other cash crop in the country.
With the recent closure of some of the nation’s land borders which automatically put a check on the influx of foreign rice into the country, the government has succeeded in forcing Nigerians to eat the local rice, and indeed they are.
In fact recently, the minister of Agriculture and Rural Development, Alhaji Sabo Nanono, announced to the whole world that Nigeria may begin to export rice in the next two years.