Former United Kingdom Prime Minister Boris Johnson has come under intense criticism from Nigerians on social media after stating during a recent public appearance that he felt “perfectly safe” in Nigeria, a remark many users described as dismissive of the country’s ongoing security challenges.
Johnson made the statement during his visit to Imo State earlier this week, where he addressed stakeholders at an economic summit.
His comment circulated widely hours later, triggering a wave of reactions across X, Facebook, and other platforms from citizens who argued that his experience as a high-profile visitor under heavy protection does not reflect the reality faced by ordinary Nigerians.
Moreover, users posted contrasting accounts of insecurity, citing repeated incidents of banditry, abductions, and communal attacks in northern and central communities.
Several critics argued that international figures often make flattering statements about host governments while ignoring the daily threats faced by residents.
“This is the kind of statement you make when moving with a convoy that blocks every road for you,” one user posted, while another wrote that Johnson’s remark sounded like a “political compliment, not the truth.”
Furthermore, some online commentators suggested that the former UK leader’s description could be used by authorities to downplay serious security concerns that Nigerians have raised for years.
However, a smaller number of users defended Johnson’s comment, noting that parts of the country remain stable and safe for business, tourism, and investment.
They argued that negative stereotypes harm Nigeria’s global image and deter potential economic partnerships.
The online debate highlights the broader narrative gap between visiting global figures and local residents who navigate varying degrees of risk daily.
It also underscores how comments from international leaders can quickly become symbolic touchpoints in Nigeria’s ongoing national conversation about safety, governance, and global perception.
Johnson has not issued any clarification regarding the backlash, while discussions continue to gain traction across digital platforms.
The response suggests that public sensitivity around security narratives remains high, especially when framed by foreign voices.