, Nnamdi Kanu){kind=link}
For the second time in a row, the detained leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, has failed to begin his defence in his ongoing terrorism trial at the Federal High Court in Abuja.
Kanu, who had earlier decided to represent himself, told the court that he was unable to proceed because his disengaged legal team had yet to hand over his case file.
The development stalled proceedings that were expected to see him open his defence on Friday.
“My lord, my lawyers withdrew from the case only yesterday, and I’ve not received the necessary documents to continue on my own,” Kanu told the court.
“Those who could have assisted me in getting the files were also prevented from seeing me,” he added while pleading for more time to prepare.
The lead counsel representing the Federal Government, Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), did not object to Kanu’s request but urged the court to uphold its earlier directive, which gave the defendant six days to open his defence.
“We understand his situation, my lord, but this is already the second day,” Awomolo said.
“The court made an order, and it’s only proper that the timeline be respected.”
In his ruling, Justice James Omotosho reminded the IPOB leader of his constitutional right to a fair hearing but encouraged him to use the opportunity wisely.
The judge emphasised that while Kanu could not be forced to proceed, he should take advantage of the time already provided.
Justice Omotosho subsequently adjourned the trial until Monday, granting Kanu a final opportunity to open his defence.
A legal observer present at the court noted that the adjournment further highlights the tension surrounding the high-profile case, which has drawn both national and international attention.
“Given the nature of this trial, every delay carries political and legal weight,” the observer said. “The next sitting could determine how quickly the matter moves forward.”
The case, which has spanned several months, continues to generate widespread debate over due process, fair hearing, and the broader implications for Nigeria’s justice system.