Human rights lawyer Ifeanyi Ejimakor, who also represents Nnamdi Kanu, the embattled leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), has criticized the arrest of popular Anambra native doctor Chidozie Nwangwu, known as ‘Akwa Okuko Tiwara Aki.’
Ejimakor, in a statement on Sunday, condemned the Anambra State Government for what he described as an unlawful arrest, arguing that it violates Nwangwu’s fundamental rights and raises concerns about the abuse of state power for personal or political motives.
AFRIPOST reported yesterday that Okuko was widely known for his flamboyant lifestyle, often showcased on social media was arrested yesterday.
The lawyer, however demanded the native doctor’s immediate and unconditional release, warning that his detention not only lacks legal justification but also sets a dangerous precedent for suppressing religious and expressive freedoms in Nigeria.
“It is deeply concerning that Chief Chidozie Nwangwu, popularly known as Akwa Okuko Tiwara Aki, has been unlawfully arrested by the Anambra State Government. This egregious act not only tramples on his fundamental rights but also raises serious questions about the abuse of state power for political or personal vendettas,” Ejimakor stated.
He revealed that since news of the arrest broke, he has received numerous calls and messages from concerned individuals questioning the legality of Nwangwu’s detention.
According to Ejimakor, the native doctor was invited for a meeting by the Deputy Governor of Anambra State, only to be allegedly ambushed and detained upon arrival.
The controversy stems from a circulating video in which Nwangwu reportedly spoke about preparing a substance called ‘Okeite.’
However, Ejimakor argued that the video was neither released on Nwangwu’s official platforms nor promoted by him. Even if the claims in the video were true, he maintained that no crime had been committed.
Citing Sections 38, 39, and 40 of the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria (as amended), Ejimakor emphasized that every citizen has the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion, and expression.
He insisted that these rights cannot be arbitrarily violated by any government or authority.